Step 2.2 — Pre-Onboarding Carrier Vetting (Highway + Carrier 411)

Previous step: Step 2.1 — Carrier Identification Next step: Step 2.3 — Highway Carrier Onboarding

Note

Forza uses Highway as primary vetting engine — not SaferWatch (EZ Loader’s default). Highway’s vetting is more comprehensive and integrates into EZ-Loader via API.


🎯 Ideal State

Trigger: A carrier has been identified (Step 2.1) and Forza is considering dispatch or proactive network addition.

Highway Vetting Checks

CheckWhat It VerifiesAutomation
Identity verificationCarrier is who they claim to beAutomated by Highway
Insurance monitoringCurrent cargo + liability coverage, policies not expiredAutomated — Highway pulls directly from insurer databases
Compliance trackingFMCSA operating authority active, DOT# in good standingAutomated by Highway
Fraud / double-brokering detectionSuspicious patterns, known fraud alertsAutomated by Highway
Observed equipmentWhat equipment carrier actually operatesAutomated — Highway tracks historical load data
Lane activity heatmapWhether carrier is actively running quoted lanesAutomated by Highway
Total broker connectionsHow many brokers have worked with this carrierAutomated by Highway
Weekly load volumeCarrier’s typical weekly volumeAutomated by Highway
Equipment ageAge of trucks/trailers — critical for reefer on produce loadsAutomated by Highway

Supplementary Check — Carrier 411

Highway does not provide Freight Guard reports. Forza uses Carrier 411 for Freight Guard reports only. Data is not auto-synced — Ops manually reviews and notes concerns in the carrier record.

Risk Assessment Outcomes

Risk ClassificationAction
AcceptableProceed with onboarding
ConditionalJames (Ops Manager) reviews case-by-case. Based on specific factors and load type.
UnacceptableDo not onboard. Carrier does not enter Forza’s system.

Owner: James, Jen run vetting checks. James (Ops Manager) makes judgment call on Conditional cases.

🤖 SYSTEM AUTOMATION:

Highway’s checks run automatically and continuously re-verify. Risk assessment is automated — human judgment applies only at Conditional-tier cases.

🛑 HARD GATE:

A carrier must pass Highway vetting before any profile is created in EZ-Loader. An “Unacceptable” risk classification blocks onboarding at the carrier-facing webform level. A Carrier 411 Freight Guard report with material concerns triggers James (Ops Manager) review before proceeding.


📍 Current State

  • Highway is the active primary vetting tool, integrated with EZ-Loader via API — working correctly.
  • Carrier 411 is used standalone for Freight Guard reports. Data does not flow into EZ-Loader or Highway automatically.
  • Load Guard ($49/mo) is in Forza’s stack but neither James nor Concetta uses it. Candidate for cancellation — pending Nick (Founder/CEO) decision.
  • SaferWatch is not in use despite being EZ-Loader’s default carrier monitoring integration.
  • Load Lock Plus — Forza pays for this Highway feature but does not utilize it. Status in EZ-Loader integration unverified as of early March.

🚧 Gap

  1. Carrier 411 runs in parallel with Highway but is not integrated — creates a manual context-switch during vetting.
  2. Load Guard is being paid for but not used.
  3. Load Lock Plus is paid for but not utilized — need to verify whether it’s live in the EZ-Loader integration.
  4. No documented Ops Manager review protocol for Conditional risk assessments.
  5. No centralized record of Carrier 411 Freight Guard report findings preserved in the carrier profile.

🛠️ Gap Closure Actions

  • Document the Ops Manager review protocol for Conditional risk assessments Owner: Casey + James | Effort: Low
  • Establish a standard for preserving Carrier 411 Freight Guard findings in EZ-Loader carrier documents | Effort: Low
  • Verify Load Lock Plus status in EZ-Loader integration — activate if live, track roadmap if not Owner: James + EZ Loader support + Highway support | Effort: Low
  • Nick decision required: Cancel Load Guard subscription | Effort: Decision
  • Evaluate whether Carrier 411 is still the right tool for Freight Guard reports or whether an integrated alternative exists Owner: Casey + James | Effort: Medium